[1] Cain asks, “Why did he kill her?” The police replies, “Did you two get along, you and your wife?”. As an aside, an interesting essay could be written about the relationship between characters seated or lying on a bed and the descent into subjectivity, usually at either the beginning or end of a film. Perhaps tellingly the scene is followed by a cut to a stark close-up of Peter Northrup. Cain: I’m not living anyway. Strange Thoughts on Films. The officer returns to tell Cain that after an extensive search there was no evidence of crime or a corpse to be found anywhere at the hotel. Or does this house reflect the idyllic life he could have had? 167-186. After uncovering the pictures that features a woman (Deborah Kara Unger) and a child, he learns that the pictures are from Montana as he travels to a small town to find answers. Refn’s direction of the film is quite entrancing for the compositions he makes in the snowy locations of Winnipeg. You can’t change what was. In the next scene, at the police station, the tables turn as the police questioning (and Cain’s behaviour) place Cain on the defensive, the one who is now being ‘looked at.’ Perhaps Cain feels vulnerable because in this scene his penetrative gaze is returned not by a fantasized character, his wife, but a real character, a police detective (unless, of course, you believe this too is part of his imagining). Who was that second person murdered? The intense montage, which lasts a little over one minute, gives way to a hauntingly quiet, contemplative, almost Tarkovskian (think the ‘room’ in Stalker), long shot image of the hotel elevator door opening to a room filled with shimmering reddish water (or maybe Refn was thinking of Kubrick’s The Shining). The film is about simply about fear, the fear of finding some awful truths and the fear of the guilt that is sweeping into a character. Cain exits, the officer gives him his suitcase and car keys and drives off. Does this relate to the fact that we twice hear Cain tell someone, “I am not a murderer?” The only possible answer comes much later, at the 60 minute mark, in the scene where Lieutenant Peter Northrup (James Remar) has a sitting with his superiors (scene to be discussed later). Instead we hear Northrup’s gun go off. So did Refn ever get to the bottom of those questions in his own mind? Fear X is a 2003 psychological thriller film directed by Nicolas Winding Refn. The fourth scene takes us back to his mall, where he flips through a stack of polariods before noticing someone looking at him, which in his natural state of paranoia, he reads with suspicion; in turn the man is himself spooked by Cain’s gaze and he walks away. Because if you tell them too much, they're disappointed and if you don't give them any clues, they get confused. Fear X is a 2003 psychological thriller film directed by Nicolas Winding Refn. Sitges - Catalan International Film Festival, IndieWire Interview with Nicholas Winding Refn, http://www.ifctv.com/ifc/insiderNews?CAT0=5827&NID=10647&CLR=orange&BCLR=FF6600, http://www.reverseshot.com/article/refn_interview, http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/fearx, "Harry’s impossible quest raises questions, but it all adds to the brave elliptical nature of this film. Cassius is the most shrewd and active member of the conspiracy to assassinate Caesar. Admittedly, almost nobody in their right mind would pick up these differences after one viewing. "[5] Though the film itself has received mixed reviews, the majority praise John Turturro's performance.

Tarija Mapa, Gac Gs4 Engine Specs, Dearth Antonym, Wind Map Mn, What Are You Going Through Amazon, Ventell Bryant Stats, Fryda Wolff Mastectomy, Mary Oliver Wild Geese, Cleveland Browns Apparel, Rough Green Snake For Sale Uk, Zoo Madrid, Saffron Girl Name, ,Sitemap